Saturday, June 27, 2009

THE FACE OF CHANGE



Will we know it when we see it?

We love to shake our fists in the air, demanding change in government, in society, change at last, change, change, change...but are we ready, as individuals, to will it? I wonder now as I encounter the various reactions to Nicanor Perlas and his intention to run for President of our country in 2010.

Is he winnable? Oh, what a dreamer. Brave, but he just won't win. Does he have money? What machinery does he have? I'm going for the "sure" candidate. He doesn't even figure in the surveys. Nobody knows him.

Do these questions and reactions bring authentic change to mind? How can we be vessels of change when our thinking echoes patterns of the past---the very consciousness that created the mess we're in? How can we be bearers of change when we don't even see our role in it? Winnability? Who and where did our present standards come from? Are they really relevant to you? Is that how you see the world? Surveys. This is another standard created by certain people in society that really only carries as much weight as we put on it. I haven't ever been approached to take part in any survey and the current results certainly don't reflect the sentiments of my network--which isn't puny, mind you. To me, they mean nothing. Surveys will not affect my vote because I vote with my head, heart and will in total and unsinkable harmony. I will put my actions behind my deepest and truest aspirations for this country, no matter what anybody else says.

When we say we want change, exactly how do we see this happening? Though there are a brave few who have stepped-up and decided to be part of this new energy no matter what, a lot are still hanging back with the fears and misconceptions of the past, despite their loud cries for change. So many of us are unable to see that change is upon us because we keep looking at the world through the lens of the past. Alas, new worlds do not emerge from there.

If we say we believe in one person but won't vote for him because he isn't "winnable", we are saying that our votes count for nothing. We are saying that winnability rests on the candidate alone and our participation in the process has no bearing on the outcome. When we say it is unrealistic to run without throwing hundreds of millions of pesos away, we are saying that integrity and qualifications don't count--the very things our country has been thirsting for, for decades. We are not just saying that the practice of spending a crazy amount of money is an acceptable standard; we agree that it is valid. When we say no one knows him, we're saying we won't take the time to and assume others won't, or that new and unheard of Filipinos-- never mind that they are qualified or that we've been praying for them all our lives--will never stand a chance because, well, they're not popular enough.

Has any popular candidate today and in the past, with lots of money to burn, and who met all our so-called ideas of "winnability", topping all possible surveys, ever given us the change we so need and want? How many times have we convinced ourselves it was smarter to vote for someone who would win, instead of someone we wanted to win? Where has that brought us? Has anybody who has only ever followed existing molds ever inspired a nation?

It is always those who create new and untrodden trails who do. When there is someone new at last, will we be able to recognize him or will we still be looking for the old where he stands, because our standards are stuck there, unable to move towards the future? Are we really clear about the change we want to make happen and are we sure we will able to move in its direction?

For as long as we are just mouthing the words, we cannot be vessels of the new. If we are tied down and immobilized by concepts of the past that have been rammed down our throats by the external world, and not moved by our inner longing, heartfelt hope and higher thinking, we are zombies of the past. If we think that change is created outside by others--the system, the leader--then it truly cannot happen in this lifetime. But if we can finally wake up to our human calling of being co-creators of this world, able to not only destroy as we too often do, but to restore, heal and transform what is around and beneath us, then can you imagine the possibilities?

Change begins inside us in mostly painful ways. I think of the pain as making space, denting the perfect sphere of clay so that you can begin to shape the chalice. It is painful because what was--whatever that is--can no longer be. It means finding squares and triangles where circles used to be and letting go of things that no longer work. It is a difficult but rewarding process that cannot happen without our mindful participation and our love for what is true and just.

Change is upon us. Obama winning (he wasn't winnable either, does anyone remember?)is just part of this larger picture of change wanting to happen in the world and waiting for us to be ready at last. It can happen here but only if we acknowledge that it isn't and never was in the hands of one or a few. It is in yours, too, should you decide to take it on and see it through. This is the moment when we can finally make the shift from "why" to "why not".

Really, why not? Let us not wait for change to come to us; instead, let us allow it to come through us. I think it has become ever more clear that it is the only way true and positive change can manifest today.

7 comments:

ipe5520 said...

Hi Panjee:

Good post on change and our role in it especially as election looms. I think what we are looking for is a "key" that unlocks individual, household, community, institution, nation and state pathways to change. It has to be an "integrated", for lack of a better word, organizing principle or maybe "energy field" that changes pathways, individual and collective towards real change. Changing a leader within an old system risks the leader being changed and not the system. Thus, we need to invent processes that are not yet created as venues for changing the old and ushering in the new. And here I make the pitch for the Peoples' Primaries as a process to change traditional parties self-proclaiming their candidates because of, as you say, winnability, is the only factor they consider. The control by the few of the choice of our candidates is a symptom of "trickle down" or pinatulo politics. A new process such as the Peoples' Primaries opens new pathways for citizens to have a say as to who the candidates should be in the first place and by so doing engage them in the whole political process of agenda setting and re-imagining the Philippines.

Panjee said...

Hi Philip,

Thanks for dropping in. Dale and I are very excited about the potential of the Peoples' Primaries. So far, it's in tune with PAGASA values. I really like "pinatubo" vs "pinatulo" and PAGASA has always been for pinatubo initiatives. Here's to the success of the Peoples' Primaries plus all authentic reform initiatives. It's a great chance for the Philippines to grow-up (pinatubo :p) at last!

aggieboo120ph@yahoo.com said...

Hi Panjee,

I totally agree with your insights.

Since when have we put our national elections on the same level as a cockfight? Since when has "winnability" become an important consideration in choosing a candidate? Sadly, so many Filipinos decide on this basis.

It would be great if your writing can be shared again with a broad audience. This is really what we need to challenge and change the prevailing consciousness and mindset of our kababayans. "Change" has become such a common buzzword and an abused term for political slogans and agendas of trapos that it has lost its essence and merely represents superficial changes.

Thanks to PAGASA for representing REAL change and for reminding us that it is something to commit to. Keep on bringing this message across...

David D'Angelo said...

Winnability is not an issue for how can we really make a step towards change if we will not believe in the change we wanted. Nick Perlas' candidacy is not about himself for I know that in contrast to the leaders of the part, he will indeed walk with us therefore we should also would with him.

This article echoes some of the key sentiments why I started, "Pagod Ka Na Bang Maging si Juan?"... for many are already frustrated but many are inspiring hope that will soon engulp this country.

I will share this article on my blog at http://pagodkanaba.blogspot.com ... please also vote on the polls at the blog and show your choice.

Thanks!

Panjee said...

Agnes, salamat. Feel free to share the article with your network and add your own thoughts. The more people speak out--passionately--the more we will get heard.

Dave, I voted na a few days ago pa on your site. Salamat and I'm sure it's just a matter of time before we cross paths again!

Gail Mallo said...

hello. i' gail. i used to read your philippine star column a lot and liked how you write. i googled you and found out that you have a blog. i'm happy!

you writing made me inspired to write again. i used to write a lot but then i stopped. i reflect on my life and things around me a lot too and it's nice to know that this blog gives me hope to be happy again after the storm i just went through.

just wanted to know that stumbling upon this blog is the best thing that happened to me today.

God bless!

Ron Davison said...

The more I talk with educated, well intentioned friends who express dismay about about change here in the States, the more convinced I am that that "they" have won every time another person with some measure of idealism and intelligence chooses to become cynical. I think that we have trouble with change for the same reason we have trouble with love: it requires a naiveté and optimism that experience refutes. And yet, really, what other choice do we have?
Thanks for the post Panjee. This is such an important point.